كتاب الحياة

حواراتي مع الذكاء الإصطناعي
(MW-001)

⭕ في اي سن لا ينصح فيه للمرأة بالانجاب؟
لا يُنصح بالإنجاب عادةً بعد سن 35 إلى 40 عاماً؛ حيث تبدأ الخصوبة في الانخفاض السريع وتزيد مخاطر الحمل الصحية، ورغم أن الحمل ممكن، إلا أن الأطباء يعتبرون سن الـ 35 بداية مرحلة "تقدم العمر الإنجابي".
المخاطر والتحديات بعد سن 35 و 40
قلة الخصوبة: تقل جودة وعدد البويضات بشكل واضح، مما يجعل حدوث الحمل الطبيعي صعباً بمرور الوقت.
مشاكل الجنين: ترتفع احتمالية حدوث تشوهات واختلالات صبغية وجينية مثل متلازمة داون.
مضاعفات الحمل: تزيد نسبة الإصابة بسكري الحمل، ارتفاع ضغط الدم (سمم الحمل)، والإجهاض التلقائي.

-----

⭕ في اي سن لا ينصح فيه للرجل بالانجاب؟
لا يوجد سن محدد يتوقف فيه الرجل تماماً عن القدرة على الإنجاب، لكن الأطباء لا ينصحون بالإنجاب بعد سن 45 إلى 50 عاماً بسبب تراجع جودة الحيوانات المنوية وزيادة المخاطر الصحية.
المخاطر الصحية لتأخر الإنجاب عند الرجال
العيوب الجينية: تزداد احتمالية حدوث طفرات جينية وتلف في الحمض النووي للحيوانات المنوية مع التقدم في العمر.
الأمراض العصبية والنفسية: ترتفع نسب إصابة الأطفال بأمراض مثل التوحد، والفصام، واضطراب ثنائي القطب.
مضاعفات الحمل: تواجه زوجات الرجال الأكبر سناً خطراً أكبر للإصابة بسكري الحمل أو تسمم الحمل والولادة المبكرة.
ضعف الخصوبة: تقل القدرة على الإنجاب بشكل ملحوظ ويبدأ انخفاض عدد وحركة الحيوانات المنوية بوضوح بعد منتصف الأربعينيات.

In short...

Christianity, as a religion, is not even clearly understood by its own followers:
⭕ They have never reached a consensus on the true identity of Jesus, son of Mary (peace be upon him)—is he the Son of God, or is he God Himself?
Is he both divine and human (with these natures sometimes joined and sometimes separated, depending on the requirements of the narrative)?
Or is he "three-in-one"—the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?

⭕ Furthermore, they are not certain about the scripture attributed to him, which is riddled with logical and scientific contradictions.
Moreover, there is no rational explanation for why certain gospels were selected—nearly four centuries after the crucifixion (in 393 AD)—while others were discarded. Among those excluded was the Gospel of Mary Magdalene—one of the few individuals who did not flee (unlike the male disciples) and who was actually present during the crucifixion!

So, who exactly is Jesus, son of Mary (according to the various Christian denominations)?
And what kind of book is this that is referred to as "the Gospel" or "the Holy Bible"?

-------

⭕️ If Jesus had come with the purpose of atoning for the sins of all humanity—a feat that no one else has ever performed, nor ever will—would he have allowed himself to be executed alongside common thieves in such a manner (the details of which I prefer not to describe)?
▪️ The Gospel of Matthew (Chapter 27, Verse 38): "Then two robbers were crucified with Him, one on the right and one on the left."
▪️ The Gospel of Mark (Chapter 15, Verse 27): "And they crucified two robbers with Him, one on His right and one on His left." Furthermore...
⭕️ If he had come for a specific purpose, why would he have wept and begged to be saved from it once he reached that very goal?
▪️ The Gospel of Matthew (Chapter 27, Verse 46): "And about the ninth hour, Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, 'Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?'—that is, 'My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?'"
▪️ The Gospel of Mark (Chapter 15, Verse 34): "And at the ninth hour, Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, 'Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?'—which is translated, 'My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?'"

Do you even have any sense—or what exactly is going on up there in your heads?!

-------

When reading history, we must understand one thing very clearly: we should not simply believe everything we are told or adopt it as a foundation for our own thinking without first applying our critical faculties—especially when it concerns a major, significant event that cannot be easily dismissed.
Do we not live today in a world saturated with "fake news"? If that is the case now, what about accounts from hundreds or thousands of years ago? We must employ our reason extensively to get as close as possible to the truth, based on the reality that lies before our eyes and minds.

A brief yet highly significant point regarding Muhammad ibn Abdullah—to whom the Holy Quran was revealed—is that he dismantled the control held by the leaders of Mecca over his society, with the support of those who believed in him. His word became the ultimate authority, which no one could challenge; this is why it has reached us—in the very same letters and words with which he conveyed it—and it shall remain so for all eternity.

As for Jesus, son of Mary (peace be upon him), God sent him exclusively to the Children of Israel—a fact attested to in several instances within the Gospel. Consequently, his mission was not to overthrow the rulers of the Roman Empire; rather, he remained a subject within it, living under its authority. Initially, the Roman authorities viewed his situation as an internal matter for the Jewish community. However, after Jewish leaders—resorting to lies—pressured the authorities to eliminate him by accusing him of inciting rebellion against the Roman Emperor and advocating for the non-payment of taxes, he was branded an outlaw. He was subsequently arrested and sentenced to execution (by crucifixion, in keeping with their vile practices).

For this reason, there is absolutely no guarantee that his original, authentic message has reached us.
Does reason not suggest as much?

Let us examine what the Roman perpetrators did:

▪️ The Jewish High Council sought to eliminate Jesus, son of Mary, by reporting him to the governor of Jerusalem, alleging that he claimed to be a king and incited people to refuse the payment of taxes.
▪️ The governor arrested him, but the investigation yielded no evidence of wrongdoing. Nevertheless, the Jewish Council threatened to escalate the matter directly to the Roman Emperor. Fearing that he might be held accountable for any perceived negligence, the governor ordered his crucifixion.
⭕ The crucifixion of Christ (according to their account) took place in 33 AD.
⭕ The Romans destroyed the Second Jewish Temple—the very setting in which these events unfolded. The Virgin Mary worshipped there in 70 AD, following a long siege that resulted in widespread destruction and the displacement of a large portion of the population.
▪️
▪️
----------
⭕ The Lord said to Moses, "You cannot see My face" (Exodus 33:20).
Moses was a great prophet, held in high esteem by the Lord of the Worlds and throughout human history; yet, even he could not behold Him.

Yet, later on, this very Lord was born of a woman—a woman whom He Himself had created. He drank milk, grew up, walked the streets, and—according to some accounts—became a vendor of tomatoes and onions. People saw Him, and yet they lived on; none of them died upon seeing Him. On the contrary, some even spoke with Him, and others witnessed Him riding a donkey.
----------
⭕

----------
⭕
----------
⭕
----------
⭕
----------
⭕
----------
⭕
----------
⭕
----------
⭕





⭕️ Here, #jesus, son of #Mary (peace be upon him), uttered the testimony of Islam, saying:
✨️ I bear witness that there is no god but God
✨️ and that Jesus is the Messenger of God
🔹  Gospel of John (17:3)

⭕️ And here is another proof... A Samaritan woman met him and spoke with him at Jacob's Well in Nablus???... So, should I believe her, or the people who never saw him, never spoke to him, and yet inherit their faith without reason or thought, and who don't even read their own scriptures?!
🔹  Gospel of John (4:19)
--
⭕️ And other evidence confirms that he is only a human being and a noble prophet sent by God ( #Allah), not a God, not even the son of God, nor one of three.
🔹  Gospel of Matthew (21:11)
🔹  Gospel of John (6:14)
🔹  Gospel of Luke (24:19)
--
⭕️ So, if the Lord wanted to forgive people's sins, He wouldn't need to wrong anyone or send His Son to make Him weep and plead on the cross, only to abandon Him and let them kill Him, thus proving His defeat before the people He created and Satan's victory over Him and His Son, even for a single moment.